foto

Dr. M.W. Langendam PhD

Position
Scientific staff member (UD)
Main activities
Research, Teaching
Specialisation
Evidence synthesis methodology
Focus of research

Miranda Langendam joined the AMC in 2008, as staff member of the Dutch Cochrane Centre. After the Centre, hosted by the department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, moved to UMC Utrecht in January 2014 she had the opportunity to stay at AMC to develop an evidence synthesis research line.

The aim of her research is to help patients, health care providers and policy makers making evidence-based health care decisions. Trained as epidemiologist/methodologist she is interested in developing, applying and teaching methods to summarize and present the best available evidence to support health (care) decisions. The research topics she is working address a wide range of health care quations and reach from PICO formulation (e.g. defining the clinical pathway and developing core outcome sets) to guideline implementation strategies. Key words: clinical epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, GRADE, guideline development, research & teaching.

 

Key publications
  • Gopalakrishna G, Leeflang MMG, Davenport C, Sanabria AJ, Alonso-Coello P, McCaffery K, Bossuyt P, Langendam MW, Barriers to making recommendations about medical tests: a qualitative study of European guideline developers. BMJ OPEN 2016;6 (9):e010549 [PubMed]
  • Gopalakrishna G, Mustafa RA, Davenport C, Scholten RJPM, Hyde C, Brozek J, Schünemann HJ, Bossuyt PMM, Leeflang MMG, Langendam MW, Applying Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to diagnostic tests was challenging but doable. J CLIN EPIDEMIOL 2014;67 (7):760-768 [PubMed]
  • Langendam M, Carrasco-Labra A, Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Brignardello-Petersen R, Ventresca M, Heus P , Lasserson T, Moustgaard R, Brozek J, Schünemann HJ, Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed. J CLIN EPIDEMIOL 2016;74:19-27 [PubMed]
  • Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RBM, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW, SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC MED RES METHODOL 2014;14:43 [PubMed]
  • Langendam MW, van der Werf MJ, Huitric E, Manissero D, SERIES "RATIONAL USE OF ANTI-TUBERCULOSIS DRUGS" Edited by G. B Migliori and D. Manissero Number 1 in this Series Prevalence of inappropriate tuberculosis treatment regimens: a systematic review. EUR RESPIR J 2012;39 (4):1012-1020 [PubMed]
All Publications
Research programmes

Evidence synthesis methodology: making sense of evidence

The research line is largely based on the conceptual framework of the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. GRADE provides a patient-centred framework to present evidence summaries, to assess and rate the certainty of evidence, to move from evidence to recommendation and to grade the strength of recommendations (www.gradeworkinggroup.org). Adopted by many evidence synthesis and guideline development organisations, GRADE is considered the state of the art methodology to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Her current research aims to contribute to further development of GRADE, e.g. by applying GRADE to different domains (diagnosis, preclinical animal studies, environmental health) and different types of decisions (clinical management, coverage decisions). Evaluating the use of GRADE, implementing GRADE in the Netherlands, consultation and training are also part of Miranda's work.

The main research theme for the coming years is to develop and appraise methods for linking and interpreting different types of evidence and evidence streams. This is particularly relevant in the evaluation of medical tests, where direct evidence on the clinical utility is scarce. Together with the Biomarkers and Test Evaluation (BiTE) program, led by professor Patrick Bossuyt, development of guideline methodology with regard to recommendations about medical tests is a high priority topic. More general, the research line is targeted to improving the quality of systematic reviews and clinical and public health guidelines.

Miranda's work is characterized by a high level of collaboration on local, national and international level (e.g. Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland), McMaster University, Cochrane, GRADE working group). First of all because a methodologist needs content experts to do meaningful work, but also because evidence synthesis is a rapidly evolving research field and a study design that is often used. At the AMC she is collaborating with colleagues from several departments. The aim for the coming years is to formalize collaboration (e.g. joint grant proposals, PhD students and post-docs), and – with regard to the alliance – to explore collaboration with VUmc (e.g. APH Methodology).

Faculty
Dr. M.W. Langendam PhD

PhD Students
M. Ravinskaya MSc
N.F. Steutel
B.D. Yang MD

Prof. dr. P.M.M. Bossuyt (BIomarker and Test Evaluation program (BITE))

Current research funding
  • Nederlandse Vereniging voor Kindergeneeskunde